Discussion about this post

User's avatar
R Dymond's avatar

Thank you!!!

Chip Pitfield's avatar

An excellent essay that is not at all unreasonable. Interestingly, CPP is investing assets on behalf of future beneficiaries who will be confronted by the horrendous consequences of climate change. And these consequences will undoubtedly include food insecurity for the very people on whose behalf CPPIB is supposed to be working.

I’d also add that carbon sequestration is not at all a technology proven in Canada. The only long-life site that has operated in a manner consistent with expectations has been the Norwegian Sleipner project, which sequesters carbon underneath the North Sea. The AB Pathways proposal involves sequestering carbon underneath Alberta, which is a geography riddled with over 180,000 we’ll bores. It is hypothetical and may or not operate as hoped.

No posts

Ready for more?